Is the Future of Work Remote or Hybrid?

In this article, we’re going to discuss:

• Why hybrid work is a performance strategy when built with intent.
• How different industries are shaping hybrid models to fit their specific workflows and goals.
• What actually improves with flexible work: productivity, retention, and cost efficiency.
• Which tools can give you the clarity and accountability to make working from home succeed at scale.

‍

A new work reality is already here. The office no longer anchors productivity, and remote isn’t a perk. Yet somewhere between the all-or-nothing narratives, a hybrid environment emerged. 

Not as a compromise, but as a challenge: how do you build cohesion without proximity? Accountability without surveillance? Culture without a shared ZIP code?

Hybrid should be reframed as a strategic advantage when built with intention. You’ll leave with a clearer view of what model works best for which types of work, how leading companies are making hybrid operational, and why flexible isn’t the opposite of focused.

Let’s rethink the real future of work, before you get pulled back into the past.
‍

The Problem with Outdated Work Models

Too many companies are designing the future of work by looking backward. They’re rebuilding office routines, not rethinking how work actually happens. The default plan, bring everyone back a few days a week, pretends hybrid is just an office culture with a looser schedule, even though it’s not.

Return-to-office decisions are still driven by assumptions. Leaders cite vague concerns about collaboration or productivity but rarely explain what’s missing or how they’ll measure improvement. SHRM found that more than half of workers in hybrid setups don’t know why specific in-office days matter. That confusion is a management failure.

Worse, most companies still treat location as a proxy for performance. Being visible gets mistaken for being effective. This thinking penalizes people with long commutes, caregiving responsibilities, or different working styles. It also locks companies into high real estate costs without knowing if the space is even being used well.

Work today happens across multiple time zones, tools, and preferences. A one-size-fits-all model simply doesn’t fit the work or the workforce.
‍

Rethinking Work: What Hybrid Really Unlocks

Hybrid is a structure. The companies getting it right are designing systems around when and where different kinds of work happen best.

Some roles need quiet focus, while others need quick collaboration. The value isn’t in splitting time evenly but in matching the environment to the task. When that alignment happens, people feel more in control, more trusted, and more engaged.

That only works if you understand what each model actually enables and where each one falls short.
‍

Remote Work Offers Focus, Flexibility & Risks

When location doesn’t matter, access expands. Remote models allow companies to hire across cities, countries, even time zones, building teams that look less alike and think more independently. Employees gain more control over their time, often trading commute hours for deep work or rest. For individual productivity, remote work has proven its case.

But focus comes with friction. Without a shared space, informal learning fades, onboarding slows, and collaboration becomes scheduled. When performance isn’t visible, some people overwork to prove they’re present, especially junior staff who feel unseen.

The other risk is drift. Remote setups without clear accountability often become silent, with missed messages, projects without owners, and feedback that arrives too late. Transparency has to be built in, not assumed.
‍

Hybrid Work Creates Alignment, When It’s Intentional

Hybrid models work when they’re specific, not to individuals but to the work itself. Some tasks are better in person, like creative sprints, team strategy, and onboarding. Others benefit from the quiet of home. The mistake is assuming a default schedule creates balance. Coordination without purpose leads to crowded calendars and empty offices.

But when hybrid is clear about what happens where, teams align faster. Meetings shrink. Focus time expands, and people can show up to plan.

Clarity in a hybrid environment is rare. Many companies assign remote work vs office work days without defining their value. That opens the door to proximity bias, where those seen more often get promoted faster. It also creates two experiences: one for people in the room, another for those dialing in.

Done right, hybrid becomes a rhythm. Done poorly, it becomes a divide.
‍

In-Office Work Builds Culture, But at a Cost

There’s value like fast feedback, spontaneous problem-solving, and shared momentum in presence. Office environments make it easier to mentor, train, and observe. For teams still forming or roles that depend on rapid coordination, being together matters.

But that value comes with a cost, financial and human. Offices require space, equipment, and maintenance. For employees, commuting drains time and energy, and when presence becomes policy, resentment builds. People notice when they’re asked to be somewhere without a clear reason.

In some cases, the office serves the habit, not the work, and rebuilding habits just because they’re familiar isn’t a strategy.
‍

Where Hybrid Is Working in 2025

The most effective hybrid strategies are operational. Companies across industries have moved beyond policy and into practice, reshaping how they schedule, collaborate, and measure success, but the results don’t look the same everywhere. A system that works for a tech startup may fall flat in finance. What matters is fit: hybrid models that reflect the pace, pressure, and priorities of the business.

Let’s look at how different kinds of companies are using hybrid to solve real challenges:
‍

Tech: How GitLab Scaled as a Fully Remote Company Then Built Hybrid Into the Edges

GitLab built one of the largest all-remote organizations in the world, with more than 2,000 employees spread across over 65 countries. What started as a necessity for a distributed open-source team evolved into a deliberate operating model with written processes, asynchronous workflows, and documented decision-making at its core.

But even GitLab recognized that not everything scales without touchpoints. In 2023, they began encouraging regional meetups, travel stipends, and optional co-working access to support team cohesion. The message was clear: remote-first doesn’t mean remote-only.

Rather than default to hybrid as a policy, GitLab added hybrid elements as needed: by team, by project, and by individual preference. That level of design is what made the model sustainable.
‍

Finance: How American Express Redefined Office Time Around Purpose

American Express doesn’t require employees to be in the office a set number of days. Instead, they ask a different question: what work needs to happen together?

Their hybrid policy, rolled out globally, is built on the idea of “purposeful presence.” Teams decide when and why to meet in person, whether it’s onboarding, client workshops, or team planning. The company provides broad guidance, but leaves execution to business units.

That trust-based model has helped them retain flexibility without losing cohesion. It also avoids the friction of enforcing uniform rules across different job types. Analysts, relationship managers, and product designers don’t work the same way, and their schedules shouldn’t either.

American Express redesigned how their offices are used. Collaboration zones replaced desk rows, and quiet spaces became bookable. The result is a hybrid workplace.
‍

Insurance: How Zurich Built Hybrid Around Outcomes

Zurich Insurance took a bold approach in 2023: they stopped measuring hybrid success by office attendance. Instead,  they started measuring outcomes. The company gave their 56,000 employees global flexibility to choose where they work, as long as performance stayed high and customer needs were met.

They followed years of internal research showing no drop in productivity when people worked from home. The biggest change was engagement. Teams with control over their schedules consistently reported higher satisfaction, and lower turnover followed.

To support the shift, Zurich redesigned policies around output metrics. Managers received training to assess performance objectively. Meetings were audited for value. Technology was standardized across locations to level the playing field.

The result was more clarity on what mattered, how success was defined, and where trust fits into performance.
‍

Why Smart Hybrid Strategy Beats Blanket Policies

When hybrid is aligned with how people work, they get more done, stay longer, and burn out less. Companies that build around this principle are outperforming others. 

McKinsey found that organizations with flexible models tailored to job needs saw up to 25% higher productivity than those enforcing rigid schedules. Flexibility, when structured well, has also been linked to reduced attrition by as much as 35% in high-skill roles, according to Gallup’s 2024 State of the Workplace report.

Hybrid also enables smarter resource planning. CBRE’s latest survey shows that companies who track remote workers' productivity to optimize hybrid usage have cut real estate costs by up to 30%, reinvesting savings into technology, talent, and team development. Those that didn’t adjust reported lower utilization and rising internal dissatisfaction.

This is about performance. When people know what’s expected and have the freedom to meet it in the best environment, they don’t need constant oversight and produce better results.
‍

How to Start Building a Smarter Hybrid Strategy Today

There’s no single blueprint for hybrid that works everywhere, but there are patterns that work better. Start by designing around what the work needs, then back it with tools and habits that reinforce clarity and accountability.
‍

• Audit roles and schedules. Start by mapping out which tasks require in-person collaboration, which can be done asynchronously, and which need real-time visibility. Don’t assume the same cadence works across functions.
  
  
• Let teams design their own rhythms. Offer a framework, like team-defined anchor days or in-person milestones, but allow flexibility within it. Top-down mandates often fail in practice.
  
  
• Level the playing field with shared systems. Standardize tools for meetings, communication, and tracking. A remote team using Slack and a co-located team using whiteboards aren’t working in the same world.
  
  
• Measure performance based on output, not presence. Remote employee management software like Insightful allows teams to track time, activity, and outcomes without relying on outdated attendance logic. This kind of visibility helps teams manage themselves wherever they are.
  
  

One company that made this shift successfully is Stratum Benefits, a financial services firm managing hybrid teams across South Africa. After implementing employee time tracking from Insightful, they gained real-time clarity on how work was happening in the office and remotely.

That visibility helped managers spot burnout risks, recognize high performers, and support struggling employees with data. Productivity stabilized, performance gaps narrowed, and employees felt more in control of how and where they worked.
‍

Rethink Work to Redesign Results

The most effective companies in 2025 aren’t debating whether remote or hybrid is better. They’ve stopped picking sides. Instead, they’re using data from employee productivity monitoring software to design work around results, and they’re doing it with structure, not slogans.

Whether your team is in the office, at home, or somewhere in between, what matters most is clarity: clear expectations, shared tools, and the confidence to measure what matters. Insightful helps make that clarity possible across any model, giving you the visibility to manage with trust.

Start a 7-day free trial or book a demo to see Insightful in action.




UPDATED ON: 20 May 2025

‍